Fractal Tessellations from Proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem
نویسنده
چکیده
The Pythagorean theorem can be proven geometrically through the use of dissections of squares and triangles. Four of these decompositions are paired into two compound dissections, which are used to create novel images. Pythagorean Theorem Many proofs of the Pythagorean theorem are given in the literature, for example, at the MathWorld web site [1]. Of particular interest to this work are dissection proofs, wherein a figure is cut into pieces and reassembled into another figure with equal area. Several of these are collected at the Cut The Knot web site [2]. Figure 1: Dissection Proofs In this work, four dissections were used, as shown in Figure 1. Two were based on decomposing a square into a smaller square and four congruent right triangles. The other two decomposed a right triangle into a square and smaller similar right triangles. In each case, algebraically equating the area of the larger figure with the sum of the areas of the smaller shapes leads to the Pythagorean theorem. Fractal Tessellations When dissection results in pieces that can be further dissected, a fractal tessellation can be created by infinitely continuing the process. In this case, each dissection produced both squares and right triangles, which could be further broken down. Each square decomposition was paired with a triangle dissection into a compound process; they are shown in Figure 2. The first two panels show the first square and first triangular dissections paired. The rotation of the inside square is a free parameter, and the two cases correspond to 20 and 45 degrees, respectively. As the rotation increases, the size of the outer smaller squares increases, to a maximum at 45 degrees. The last two panels show the second square and second triangular dissections paired. The rotation angles are 20 degrees and approximately 32 degrees. In the last panel, the rotation was chosen such that the central and outer small squares are congruent. 20 degrees 45 degrees 20 degrees ~31.7 degrees Compound Dissection 1 Compound Dissection 2 Figure 2: Compound Dissections New Designs These compound dissections were used to create new artworks, some of which are shown in Figure 3. All were generated using the program Ultra Fractal [3]. . These images merely hint at some of the possibilities open to the algorithmic artist. Of course, there are other ways to decompose squares and triangles into more squares and triangles, and each of those can be incorporated into a fractal tessellation. The varieties offered, combined with the freedom afforded by rotating the central square, make this technique quite a fruitful one. Compound 1Compound 1Compound 2Compound 220 degrees rotation45 degrees20 different rotations ~31.7 degrees20 iterations7 iterations4 iterations7 iterations References[1] E. W. Weisstein. “Pythagorean Theorem,” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PythagoreanTheorem.html,1999.[2] A. Bogomolny, “Pythagorean Theorem,” http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/index.shtml, 1996.[3] Slijkerman, F., “Ultra Fractal,” http://www.ultrafractal.com, 1997.
منابع مشابه
QUT Digital Repository:
The Pythagorean tree is a fractal figure with a branching structure based upon the Pythagorean theorem. This paper describes the use of a greedy algorithm to encourage a homogenous spread of detail for asymmetrical trees and avoid localized regions of high detail. A model of prioritized branch growth based on this idea is used to optimize tree shape, allowing more visually interesting trees to ...
متن کاملEfficient Pythagorean trees: Greed is good
The Pythagorean tree is a fractal figure with a branching structure based upon the Pythagorean theorem. This paper describes the use of a greedy algorithm to encourage a homogenous spread of detail for asymmetrical trees and avoid localized regions of high detail. A model of prioritized branch growth based on this idea is used to optimize tree shape, allowing more visually interesting trees to ...
متن کاملFour Proofs of the Ballot Theorem 1
One of the great pleasures in mathematics occurs when one considers several different proofs of a single result. In fact, when one considers the myriad proofs of the Pythagorean theorem and the irrationality of √ 2 constructed over the centuries, it seems we humans can never be satisfied with just one proof. Why do we continue to devise new approaches to known results? There is something in the...
متن کاملSelf-similar fractals and arithmetic dynamics
The concept of self-similarity on subsets of algebraic varieties is defined by considering algebraic endomorphisms of the variety as `similarity' maps. Self-similar fractals are subsets of algebraic varieties which can be written as a finite and disjoint union of `similar' copies. Fractals provide a framework in which, one can unite some results and conjectures in Diophantine g...
متن کاملOn Proofs Without Words
Most mathematicians will be familiar with the above picture. This diagram, credited to the Ancient Chinese mathematical text Zhou Bi Suan Jing, is a charmingly simple visual proof of the Pythagorean Theorem, one of mathematics’ most fundamental results. It would be hard to argue that this proof is not convincing. In fact, most standard proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem still use this picture, o...
متن کامل